Gemmell's got that one right, it's called the Daliy Mail (uk newspaper) coin-flip approach to cancer study. Pick some random activity/food/ health product/ etc Heads, it causes cancer; tails it cures cancer. Then you pay some 'scientist' to make some data up to pad out your article. Simples.
let's hope! it seems as though the major problems were with lotion specifically made for babies.
Gemmell wrote:
So can Burnt toast or bred or and standing next to a tractor when its seeding his crops, and touching a scarecrows nose on December the 15th............. Soem study somewhere will always put out stupid stuff about cancer thats why its best just to live your life and if you get it get it treated if not keep on using sun block...
So can Burnt toast or bred or and standing next to a tractor when its seeding his crops, and touching a scarecrows nose on December the 15th............. Soem study somewhere will always put out stupid stuff about cancer thats why its best just to live your life and if you get it get it treated if not keep on using sun block...
